Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Recognizing Governments, Recognition of Arbitral Awards

A company based in Barbados won an arbitral award against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Venezuela”) and petitioned to have it recognized and enforced in federal court in the United States. Venezuela objected on the ground that the arbitral panel allowed the Maduro regime to replace the lawyers that represented Venezuela – even though Maduro…

Continue Reading

The FSIA and Agreements to Aribtrate

The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards has led to contested questions about personal jurisdiction, about the scope ofthe arbitration exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), and about the relationship between that exception and the New York Convention. A new case from the D.C. Circuit, Global Voice v. Republic of Guinea considers the scope…

Continue Reading

Jurisdictional Puzzles about the Enforcement of Judgments & Arbitral Awards

Two recent cases highlight unsettled questions about jurisdictional limitations on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements and arbitral awards.  The first, Alterna Aircraft V B Ltd. v. SpiceJet Ltd., addressed whether due process requires the presence of property in the forum state if the court otherwise lacks personal jurisdiction over the debtor.  In Alterna,…

Continue Reading

National Security Concerns as a “Burden” in Discovery Disputes

How should U.S. national security concerns be weighed in discovery disputes in cases that do not directly involve the U.S. government?  That question is under consideration in Pao Taftneft v. Ukraine, a case currently before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in which Russian investors seek to enforce a foreign arbitral award…

Continue Reading

Havlish v. Taliban: Second Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc

As of Spring 2026, Afghan central bank assets blocked by the U.S. government remain unavailable to satisfy terrorism-related judgments. In March, a divided Second Circuit denied rehearing en banc to victims of terrorist attacks who hold judgments against the Taliban and who seek to enforce those judgments against $3.5 billion in “blocked” assets held in…

Continue Reading

Supreme Court Coverage

The Court will hear oral argument today in Cisco Systems v. Doe I et al. to decide whether a U.S. corporation can be held liable under the Alien Tort Statue or the Torture Victim Protection Act for aiding and abetting violations of international human rights law.  The argument, which is the only one scheduled today, starts…

Continue Reading

Global Developments in Class Action Litigation

A newly revamped French website aims to report on global developments in judicial mechanisms for collective redress. As it turns out, class actions and related collective actions are becoming increasingly common in many European countries, but they are also the subject of significant debate, as highlighted by the “News” page on the site, which also describes…

Continue Reading

Immunity, Consent, and Arbitration Treaties

If a state agrees to arbitrate a dispute with a private party – through, for example, the operation of a bilateral investment treaty – and then loses the arbitration, has it waived its immunity in a suit to enforce the resulting judgment if it is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement…

Continue Reading

$16 billion judgment against Argentina reversed:  breach of contract or expropriation?

Private investors in an Argentinian oil company (YPF) sued in the Southern District of New York when Argentina nationalized part of the ownership in YPF.  Years of ensuing litigation under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) focused on whether the litigation was based on an expropriation (as the defendants argued) or a “commercial activity” (as…

Continue Reading

New Legislation Aids Claims by Victims of Nazi Expropriations

Bundesarchiv, Bild 101I-729-0001-23 / Meister / CC-BY-SA 3.0

Congress has passed legislation making it easier for plaintiffs to recover Nazi-looted art and other expropriated property.  If the president signs the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery (“Hear”) Act of 2025 into law, defendants will have fewer procedural protections from such claims, including a more limited immunity defense for foreign sovereigns. The legislation illustrates how Congress…

Continue Reading

Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Vanderbilt Law School
ingrid.brunk@vanderbilt.eduEmail

William Dodge

George Washington University Law School
william.dodge@law.gwu.eduEmail

Maggie Gardner

Cornell Law School
mgardner@cornell.eduEmail

John F. Coyle

University of North Carolina School of Law
jfcoyle@email.unc.eduEmail

Hannah Buxbaum

UC Davis School of Law
hbuxbaum@ucdavis.eduEmail

Yanbai Andrea Wang

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Bio | Posts

Natalie Reid

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Bio | Posts

Beatrice Walton

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Bio | Posts

Rinat Gareev

Whitecliff Management
Bio | Posts

Harold Hongju Koh

Yale Law School
Bio | Posts