The United States imposes a wide variety of economic sanctions on foreign individuals, foreign corporations, countries, terrorist organizations, and other entities. Sanctions are an increasingly important part of U.S. foreign policy and they play a significant role in the work of the United Nations, the European Union, and some other countries. Many sanctions do not give rise to litigation, but some do. Indeed, some sanctions legislation provides a cause of action, lifts foreign sovereign immunity, or otherwise makes it easier to sue sanctioned entities in the United States.
Sanctions related to terrorism generate a lot of litigation, so we have grouped the two topics together. Sanctions are imposed for many reasons other than terrorism, however, and some terrorism-related litigation is not a product of sanctions. Finally, sanctions are a controversial topic globally, in part because it is unclear that they are effective at changing behavior and in part because they often have negative consequences for marginalized communities in the countries subjected to sanctions, including countries like Afghanistan, Iran, and Venezuela.
Supreme Court Permits Claims Against Cruise Lines for Using Cuban Docks
On May 21, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Havana Docks, a U.S. company, may sue U.S. cruise lines under the Helms-Burton Act for using docks confiscated by the Cuban government in 1960. Title III of the Act allows U.S. nationals with claims to property expropriated by Cuba to sue any person who “traffics…
Continue ReadingNew Paper on Currency-Based Jurisdiction in U.S. Sanctions Enforcement
Customary international law limits the authority of nations to regulate extraterritorially. As described in TLB’s Primer on Extraterritoriality, a nation may exercise jurisdiction to prescribe if there is a “genuine connection” between that nation and what it wants to regulate. Customary international law limits on jurisdiction to prescribe apply to sanctions programs no less than…
Continue ReadingThe Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act
In June 2020, Russia enacted the so-called Lugovoy Law, Article 248.1 of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedural Code, which allows Russian courts to assume exclusive jurisdiction over sanctioned persons, ignoring contractual choice-of-court and arbitration clauses. Article 248.2 authorizes anti-suit and anti-arbitration injunctions by Russian courts to enforce that exclusive jurisdiction. Article 248 has been invoked repeatedly in…
Continue ReadingIngrid (Wuerth) Brunk, Does Foreign Sovereign Immunity Apply to Sanctions on Central Banks?
Scott R. Anderson, What’s Happening with Afghanistan’s Assets?
Jamie L. Boucher, et al., The Potential Impact of Terrorism Lawsuits Under the Antiterrorism Act on Ordinary Corporate, Banking and Sovereign Enterprises


