Sanctions and Terrorism

The United States imposes a wide variety of economic sanctions on foreign individuals, foreign corporations, countries, terrorist organizations, and other entities. Sanctions are an increasingly important part of U.S. foreign policy and they play a significant role in the work of the United Nations, the European Union, and some other countries.  Many sanctions do not give rise to litigation, but some do. Indeed, some sanctions legislation provides a cause of action, lifts foreign sovereign immunity, or otherwise makes it easier to sue sanctioned entities in the United States.

Sanctions related to terrorism generate a lot of litigation, so we have grouped the two topics together.  Sanctions are imposed for many reasons other than terrorism, however, and some terrorism-related litigation is not a product of sanctions. Finally, sanctions are a controversial topic globally, in part because it is unclear that they are effective at changing behavior and in part because they often have negative consequences for marginalized communities in the countries subjected to sanctions, including countries like Afghanistan, Iran, and Venezuela.

Recent Posts

The U.S. Takes the Fight Against Bribery to Foreign Officials—Take Two

Last December, Congress quietly enacted a landmark law—the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA)—which threatens foreign officials with jail time if they solicit or take bribes from American companies, foreign companies listed on exchanges in the United States, or any person present in the United States. On July 30, 2024, Congress discreetly amended the statute… before…

Continue Reading

Western Seizure of Russian Central Bank Assets Risks Sparking Global Pushback

As fighting between Russia and Ukraine continues to drag on, Kiev’s backers are taking steps to confiscate Russian central bank assets frozen in the West. Whether it is legislators advocating for such a move, governments exploring potential mechanisms or authorizing leaders to seize assets belonging to the Russian Federation, momentum is building. Doing so may…

Continue Reading

Fuld and Waldman Plaintiffs Seek Supreme Court Review

TLB has followed the Second Circuit’s decisions holding unconstitutional the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019 (PSJVTA) and denying an en banc rehearing in Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization and Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Organization over a strong dissent by Judge Steven Menashi. As predicted, the plaintiffs recently filed a…

Continue Reading