Extraterritoriality

Oral Argument Recap: Suncor v. Boulder

On Monday, the Supreme Court opened its new Term with oral arguments in Suncor v. County Commissioners of Boulder County (for background on the case, check out our preview post). Justice Alito did not participate as he has recused himself. Here are some takeaways as we await the Court’s decision. No One Is Buying the…

Continue Reading

OT26 Opens with Climate Case

When the Supreme Court opens its new Term next Monday, it will hear oral arguments in Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, a case in which the city and county of Boulder are attempting to hold oil and gas companies responsible under state tort law for local harms caused by climate change….

Continue Reading

Second Circuit: Revenue Rule Does Not Block Fraud Claims by Danish Tax Authority

Two weeks ago, in Skatteforvaltningen v. Markowitz, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision involving one of the less frequently invoked doctrines of transnational litigation: the so-called “revenue rule.” This rule essentially bars courts in one country from enforcing the tax laws of another. As the recent decision indicates, though, it does not…

Continue Reading

D.C. Circuit on Personal Jurisdiction in Foreign-Cubed Cases

The D.C. Circuit (Judge Patricia Millet) recently grappled with the limits of federal personal jurisdiction in a suit between foreign parties regarding events that took place outside the United States. In Gligorov v. Nation of Brunei, the court affirmed the dismissal of RICO claims against three corporate defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. The opinion…

Continue Reading

Fourth Circuit Affirms Extraterritorial Injunction in IP Dispute

The Fourth Circuit (Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III) recently affirmed an extraterritorial preliminary injunction in a cross-border intellectual property dispute. In dmarcian Inc. v. DMARC Advisor BV, the court engaged in distinct extraterritorial analyses of federal trademark law, federal trade secret law, and state tortious interference claims. It is a particularly well-written opinion worth reading…

Continue Reading

China’s Jurisdictional Maximalism

In 2020, Chinese courts issued an unexpected wave of anti-suit injunctions over just five months. These injunctions targeted major foreign owners of telecommunications technology, many of them European, and barred them from pursuing foreign litigation related to their patents. In 2022, the European Union (“EU”) filed a request for consultations at the World Trade Organization…

Continue Reading

District Court Holds that Federal Destruction of Property Statute Is Not Extraterritorial

On December 21, 1988, a bomb planted onboard brought down Pam Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 259 people on the plane and 11 more on the ground. By special agreement, two Libyan intelligence agents were tried for the bombing by a Scottish court sitting in the Netherlands. One was acquitted and the other…

Continue Reading

District Court Rejects Constitutional Challenge to TVPA

On June 9, 2026, in Boniface v. Viliena, Judge Allison D. Burroughs (District of Massachusetts) rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), holding that the act applies extraterritorially to torture and extrajudicial killing between aliens and that Congress had authority to pass the act under the Offenses Clause of…

Continue Reading

Throwback Thursday: RJR Nabisco v. European Community

Ten years ago, on June 20, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community. The Court held that two of RICO’s criminal provisions apply extraterritorially to the same extent as RICO’s predicate offenses, but that RICO’s civil cause of action applies only when there is injury to…

Continue Reading

New Paper on Currency-Based Jurisdiction in U.S. Sanctions Enforcement

Customary international law limits the authority of nations to regulate extraterritorially. As described in TLB’s Primer on Extraterritoriality, a nation may exercise jurisdiction to prescribe if there is a “genuine connection” between that nation and what it wants to regulate. Customary international law limits on jurisdiction to prescribe apply to sanctions programs no less than…

Continue Reading

Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Vanderbilt Law School
ingrid.brunk@vanderbilt.eduEmail

William Dodge

George Washington University Law School
william.dodge@law.gwu.eduEmail

Maggie Gardner

Cornell Law School
mgardner@cornell.eduEmail

John F. Coyle

University of North Carolina School of Law
jfcoyle@email.unc.eduEmail

Hannah Buxbaum

UC Davis School of Law
hbuxbaum@ucdavis.eduEmail

Kish Parella

Washington and Lee University School of Law
Bio | Posts

Marketa Trimble

William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Bio | Posts

Aaron D. Simowitz

Willamette University College of Law
Bio | Posts

Robert Kry

MoloLamken LLP
Bio | Posts

Jackson Myers

MoloLamken LLP
Bio | Posts

Russell Pulver

Bio | Posts

Rachel Bayefsky

University of Virginia School of Law
Bio | Posts

Paul B. Stephan

University of Virginia School of Law
Bio | Posts

Alex Rivenbark

Law Clerk
Bio | Posts