Human Rights Litigation

Victims of human rights violations sometimes bring claims in U.S. courts, including claims based on violations outside the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized a limited cause of action for human rights claims under the Alien Tort Statute. Congress has also enacted statutory causes of action such as the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) and the Trafficking Victim Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Human rights claims against individuals often raise questions of foreign official immunity.

A Primer on Human Rights Litigation

By William S. Dodge

June 22, 2022 posted in: Human Rights Litigation

Modern human rights law developed in response to the events of the World War II, although it has earlier precursors. In 1948, the U.N. General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a non-binding declaration. More than seventy human rights treaties followed, including the Genocide Convention, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,…

Recent Posts

Throwback Thursday: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain

By William S. Dodge

June 27, 2024 posted in: Human Rights Litigation

On June 29, 2004, two decades ago, the Supreme Court decided Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, recognizing an implied cause of action under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for violations of human rights norms that are generally accepted and specifically defined. In this post, I look back at Sosa and discuss what has happened in ATS litigation during…

Exhausting Remedies Under the TVPA

By William S. Dodge

June 25, 2024 posted in: Human Rights Litigation

In 1992, Congress passed the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) to create an express cause of action against individuals who, under color of foreign law, commit torture or extrajudicial killing. The TVPA has an exhaustion provision requiring courts to dismiss claims under the provision “if the claimant has not exhausted adequate and available remedies in…

Chiquita Liable for Financing Colombian Paramilitary Death Squads

By Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

June 19, 2024 posted in: Human Rights Litigation

In a win for international human rights advocacy, a Florida jury has found a U.S. corporation liable for human rights violations committed in a foreign country. This first of three “bellwether” trials involved nine cases. Hundreds remain to be tried in this multidistrict litigation. The jury’s verdict is the latest development in a civil case…

Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350

Torture Victim Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (note)

Trafficking Victim Protection Reauthorization Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1595

Nestle USA, Inc. v. Doe (2021)

Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC (2018)

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013)

Mohamad v. Palestinian Auth. (2012)

Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (2004)

Oona A. Hathaway, Christopher Ewell & Ellen Nohle, Has the Alien Tort Statute Made a Difference? A Historical, Empirical, and Normative Assessment, 107 Cornell L. Rev. (forthcoming 2022) (SSRN)

Pierre-Hugues Verdier & Paul B. Stephan, International Human Rights and Multinational Corporations: An FCPA Approach, 101 B.U. L. Rev. 1359 (2021) (SSRN)

Sara Sun Beale, The Trafficking Victim Protection Act: The Best Hope for International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. Courts?, 50 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 17 (2018) (Duke)

David Nersessian, International Human Rights Litigation: A Guide for Judges (Federal Judicial Center, 2016) (FJC)

William S. Dodge, Alien Tort Litigation: The Road Not Taken, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1577 (2014) (SSRN)

Thomas H. Lee, The Three Lives of the Alien Tort Statute: The Evolving Role of the Judiciary in U.S. Foreign Relations, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1645 (2014) (SSRN)

Beth Stephens, The Curious History of the Alien Tort Statute, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1467 (2014) (SSRN)

Paul Hoffman & Beth Stephens, International Human Rights Cases Under State Law and in State Courts, 3 UC Irvine L. Rev. 9 (2013) (SSRN)

Anthony J. Bellia, Jr. & Bradford R. Clark, The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 445 (2011) (SSRN)

Chimène I. Keitner, Conceptualizing Complicity in Alien Tort Cases, 60 Hastings L.J. 61 (2008) (SSRN)

Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith & David H. Moore, Sosa, Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (2007) (Duke)

Thomas H. Lee, The Safe-Conduct Theory of the Alien Tort Statute, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 830 (2006) (SSRN)

Beth Stephens, Translating Filártiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations, 27 Yale J. Intl. L. 1 (2002) (SSRN)

Curtis A. Bradley & Jack L. Goldsmith, III, The Current Illegitimacy of International Human Rights Litigation, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 319 (1997) (Fordham)

William S. Dodge, The Historical Origins of the Alien Tort Statute: A Response to the "Originalists", 19 Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 221 (1996) (SSRN)