The Billion-Dollar Determination of Foreign Law Question
The ongoing litigation in New York relating to the validity of certain notes issued by Venezuela’s state-owned oil company has received extensive coverage here at TLB. In 2022, I explained that the case presented a billion-dollar choice-of-law question. That choice-of-law question was answered in 2024 when the New York Court of Appeals held the validity…
Continue ReadingMaximum Comity: Recognition of Foreign Proceedings Under the Bankruptcy Code
Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code governs cross-border insolvency proceedings. It establishes a comity-based framework within which U.S. courts may recognize certain foreign insolvency proceedings and enforce orders issued in those proceedings. Like other U.S. law on the recognition of foreign proceedings, it includes a public policy exception. This post provides a brief overview…
Continue ReadingOpting Out of Federal Law II: Foreign Choice-of-Law Clauses
In a prior post, I examined when a choice-of-law clause selecting the law of a U.S. state may be used to avoid federal laws. In this post, I consider whether a choice-of-law clause selecting the law of a foreign country may be used to accomplish this same goal. The post first examines situations where the…
Continue ReadingInteresting Papers at the ASIL Midyear Meeting, Sept. 26-27
The American Society of International Law is holding its midyear meeting in Cleveland, Ohio on September 26-27, 2025. The midyear meeting includes research fora that focus on draft papers selected through an open, competitive submission process. Several selected papers may be of interest to TLB readers, including: Challenging National Security List Designations in U.S. Courts…
Continue ReadingThrowback Thursday: Forecasting Fuld
Nearly a decade ago, Professor Aaron Simowitz identified not only the problem presented in Fuld v. PLO (2025), but also the solution the Supreme Court ultimately adopted. This Throwback Thursday post highlights Simowitz’s article Legislating Transnational Jurisdiction (57 Va. J. Int’l L. 325), which offers important insights for those trying to make sense of Fuld’s…
Continue ReadingNew Paper on Extraterritorial Application of the Wire Fraud Statute
I have written before about a circuit split over when the federal wire fraud statute applies extraterritorially. The lower federal courts disagree about how much use of U.S. wires is required to make an application of the statute “domestic.” The Second Circuit has held that use of U.S. wires must be a “core component” of…
Continue ReadingOpting Out of Federal Law I: State Choice-of-Law Clauses
Most provisions of federal law are mandatory. One cannot opt out of the tax code, the wire fraud statute, or civil rights laws. There are, however, a handful of federal laws that are not mandatory. These laws expressly state that they shall not apply if private actors write language into their contracts opting out. A…
Continue ReadingDistrict Court Denies Saudi Arabia’s Motion to Dismiss 9/11 Claims
On August 28, 2025, Judge George B. Daniels (Southern District of New York) denied the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s (KSA) motion to dismiss claims arising from the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, Judge Daniels concluded that the plaintiffs had presented sufficient evidence to establish an exception to KSA’s…
Continue ReadingPersonal Jurisdiction, Consent, and the Law of Agency
I have long argued – in articles, blog posts, and amicus briefs – that it violates due process to invoke a forum selection clause to obtain personal jurisdiction over a defendant who was not a party to the agreement in which the clause appears. This position has not yet achieved universal acceptance. The state courts in…
Continue ReadingMore on Serving Foreign Defendants’ U.S. Counsel to Avoid the Hague Service Convention
In April, one of us wrote a post describing a case in which Judge Carol Bagley Amon (Eastern District of New York) relied on New York rules to order service on foreign defendants through their U.S. counsel. Because the service was completed in the United States, there was no occasion to transmit documents for service…
Continue Reading