Service of Process

SDNY Approves Email Service for Temporary Measures and Contempt

The Second Circuit’s recent decision in Smart Study Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhenshixindajixieyouxiangongsi made clear that defendants located in Hague Service Convention member states that have objected to service by postal channels typically cannot be served by email. Last month, Judge Rakoff of the Southern District of New York addressed an important limit to Smart Study’s…

Continue Reading

Can Parties Waive the Service Provisions of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act?

The answer is yes, sometimes. Failure to Raise the Defense To begin with the easiest situation, a defendant that fails to raise the defense of improper service of process, as required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), will waive the defense as provided by FRCP 12(b)(5) and (h). The strict timing requirements apply…

Continue Reading

“Waiving” the Hague Service Convention

Complying with the Hague Service Convention (HSC) is admittedly not always easy, quick, or even feasible. Not surprisingly, then, parties may want to work around the HSC through contractual language. John Coyle, Robin Effron, and I have previously explained how private parties can—and cannot—contract around the HSC. Unfortunately, the District of New Jersey (Judge Julian…

Continue Reading

Second Circuit Holds Hague Service Convention Prohibits Email Service on Chinese Defendants

On December 18, 2025, just as TLB was going on holiday break, the Second Circuit issued its decision in Smart Study Co. v. Shenzhenshixindajixieyouxiangongsi, holding that the Hague Service Convention prohibits email service on Chinese defendants. As friend-of-TLB Ted Folkman wrote shortly thereafter, “This is the one we’ve been waiting for.” The question of email…

Continue Reading

A Helpful Decision on Serving Defendants in China

We have covered extensively on TLB the challenge of serving defendants located in China in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and U.S. treaty obligations under the Hague Service Convention. In a recent decision, the District of Massachusetts (Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV) provided a thoughtful analysis of these issues—citing along the way…

Continue Reading

Pig-Butchering, Crypto, and Preliminary Injunctions

The US government just announced its largest forfeiture action ever, seeking $15B in Bitcoin from defendants in Cambodia who allegedly swindled victims in the United States and around the world. The indictment alleges a form of fraud known as “pig-butchering,” one of several kinds of crypto-related fraud beginning to generate significant transnational civil litigation in…

Continue Reading

Scholarship Critical of “Schedule A” Cases

A growing chorus of scholarly concern about “Schedule A” cases appears to be catching the attention of some district courts. In a “Schedule A” case, a holder of U.S. intellectual property rights will sue a large collection of defendants, often online merchants based outside of the United States, which it will list in a “Schedule…

Continue Reading

More on Serving Foreign Defendants’ U.S. Counsel to Avoid the Hague Service Convention

In April, one of us wrote a post describing a case in which Judge Carol Bagley Amon (Eastern District of New York) relied on New York rules to order service on foreign defendants through their U.S. counsel. Because the service was completed in the United States, there was no occasion to transmit documents for service…

Continue Reading

Serving Process on Russia Through “Diplomatic Channels” Under the FSIA

A party suing a foreign state in federal or state court must comply with the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The FSIA governs not only when a foreign state is immune from suit and from execution, but also how a foreign state must be served with process. Section 1608(a) provides four possible methods of service…

Continue Reading

The Impossibility of Schrödinger Service

In quantum physics, a system can exist in two states at the same time. When the system is observed, it settles into one of those states. The physicist Erwin Schrödinger found this notion somewhat absurd. In a thought experiment, he imagined a cat in a closed box with a flask of poison and a radioactive…

Continue Reading

Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Vanderbilt Law School
ingrid.brunk@vanderbilt.eduEmail

William Dodge

George Washington University Law School
william.dodge@law.gwu.eduEmail

Maggie Gardner

Cornell Law School
mgardner@cornell.eduEmail

John F. Coyle

University of North Carolina School of Law
jfcoyle@email.unc.eduEmail

Hannah Buxbaum

UC Davis School of Law
hbuxbaum@ucdavis.eduEmail

Rachel Brewster

Duke Law School
Bio | Posts

Marketa Trimble

William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Bio | Posts

Anokhi Patel

Vanderbilt Law School
Bio | Posts

Holden Bembry

Vanderbilt Law School
Bio | Posts

Aaron D. Simowitz

Willamette University College of Law
Bio | Posts

Wenliang Zhang

Bio | Posts

Meng Yu

China University of Political Science and Law
Bio | Posts

Alejandro Chehtman

Torcuato Di Tella Law School
Bio | Posts

Andres de la Cruz

Universidad Torcuato di Tella
Bio | Posts

Yingxin Angela Chen

Princeton University
Bio | Posts