Posts

Is It Too Dangerous To Litigate In Israel?

Many international contracts contain forum selection clauses stating that litigation must occur in the courts of another country. While these clauses provide a welcome measure of certainty as to where future disputes should be resolved, they are sometimes viewed as inconvenient by plaintiffs who would prefer to sue in the United States. In an attempt…

Continue Reading

Serving Foreign Defendants’ U.S. Counsel to Avoid the Hague Service Convention

Plaintiffs are sometimes frustrated trying to serve process on foreign defendants through the Hague Service Convention. Sometimes, they ask federal district courts to authorize service by email as an alternative means. The problem with this, as Maggie Gardner and I have explained in detail, is that that the means of service provided in the Convention…

Continue Reading

The Fuld Oral Arguments as Haiku

Justice Roberts: This is all just words! It sounds like a grab bag. Please: Give us a clear test.   Justice Thomas: PLO, PA? Are these things “persons” really? And do they have rights? Justice Alito: Why is this unfair? Don’t the defendants have an Office in New York?   Justice Sotomayor: We still need…

Continue Reading

Second Circuit Expands Scope of Anti-Terrorism Act Suits Against Foreign States

On February 4, 2025, in Schansman v. Sberbank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that foreign states and their agencies and instrumentalities may be sued under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for acts of international terrorism, provided that one of the enumerated exceptions to sovereign immunity in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act…

Continue Reading

Oral Argument Recap: Fuld v. PLO

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization. The question presented is whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019 (PSJVTA) violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause by declaring that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) have consented to…

Continue Reading

Deciding the “Real Party in Interest” in FSIA Litigation

The Second Circuit has categorized a recent case against an individual Egyptian official as a case against the Egyptian government as the “real party in interest.”  The case, Hussein v. Maait, was then dismissed because Egypt was immune from suit.  The court of appeals did a nice job laying out and applying the relevant “real…

Continue Reading

Fuld v. PLO: Argument Day!

Today, the Supreme Court is hearing oral argument in Fuld v. Palestinian Liberation Organization. The petition asks whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019 (PSJVTA) violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause by declaring that the PLO has consented to personal jurisdiction based on specified conduct. TLB’s prior coverage…

Continue Reading

The Most-Viewed Posts of 2025 (So Far)

As we approach the third anniversary of Transnational Litigation Blog—the site officially launched on March 28, 2022—I thought it would be interesting to take a look at which posts have attracted the most views in the first few months of 2025. A list of the top ten appears below. Views 1 A Primer on Choice-of-Law…

Continue Reading

Fuld Preview: Professor Briefs

Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Fuld v. Palestinian Liberation Organization. Fuld raises two interrelated issues: (1) Does the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) provide consent-based personal jurisdiction consistent with Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.?; and (2) What are the differences (if any) between the…

Continue Reading

Fuld Preview: AALS Panel on Mallory and More

Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Fuld v. Palestinian Liberation Organization. TLB’s prior coverage of Fuld can be found here. Among the key issues in Fuld is whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act’s scheme for consent-based personal jurisdiction is constitutional. In 2023, the Supreme Court decided…

Continue Reading

Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Vanderbilt Law School
ingrid.wuerth@vanderbilt.eduEmail

William Dodge

George Washington University Law School
william.dodge@law.gwu.eduEmail

Maggie Gardner

Cornell Law School
mgardner@cornell.eduEmail

John F. Coyle

University of North Carolina School of Law
jfcoyle@email.unc.eduEmail

Zachary D. Clopton

Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
zclopton@law.northwestern.eduEmail

Aaron D. Simowitz

Willamette University College of Law
Bio | Posts

John B. Bellinger

Arnold & Porter LLP
Bio | Posts

R. Reeves Anderson

Arnold & Porter LLP
Bio | Posts

Volodymyr Ponomarov

Arnold & Porter LLP
Bio | Posts

Robin Effron

Brooklyn Law School
Bio | Posts

Scott Dodson

UC Law – San Francisco
Bio | Posts

Hannah Buxbaum

Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Bio | Posts

Paul MacMahon

LSE Law School
Bio | Posts

Satjit Singh Chhabra

Khaitan and Co
Bio | Posts

Keshav Somani

Khaitan and Co.
Bio | Posts

Kartikey Mahajan

Khaitan and Co.
Bio | Posts