Substance and Procedure in Conflict of Laws
The field of conflict of laws is famously inscrutable. One of the most enigmatic doctrines in this area is the distinction between “substantive” issues and “procedural” issues. In this post, I first explain how U.S. courts distinguish between these issues for the purpose of resolving horizontal conflicts of law between sovereigns. I then explain how…
Continue ReadingArizona Supreme Court Rejects the “Closely Related” Doctrine
When may a litigant take advantage of a forum selection clause in a contract that he never signed? This is a question that has attracted considerable attention from the courts (and on this blog). Historically, a non-party was covered by a clause only when permitted under such doctrines as assumption, agency, piercing the corporate veil,…
Continue ReadingSisyphus and Forum Selection Clauses
In Greek mythology, Sisyphus was fated to push a boulder up an endless hill for all eternity. No matter how long he pushed, he and the boulder would never reach the top. I sometimes feel this way when I write about forum selection clauses. I research and blog about these provisions (a lot). I make…
Continue ReadingAdditional Thoughts on Firexo
I have three thoughts to add to John Coyle’s insightful post on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Firexo, Inc. v. Firexo Group Limited: one on choice of law, one on jurisdiction, and one on forum selection. Choice of Law Even though the majority declines to apply the “closely…
Continue ReadingThe Sixth Circuit Tackles Forum Selection Clauses
When U.S. judges fight about forum selection clauses, they tend to fight about one of two things. First, they fight about whether a federal court sitting in diversity should apply state or federal law to determine whether a clause is valid and enforceable. Second, they fight about whether a non-signatory may be bound by a…
Continue Reading