How (Not) to Decide Whether a Foreign Judgment Is Preclusive
Foreign judgments are generally entitled to recognition in the United States. Beneath that simple statement, however, lie many complexities. When lawyers and judges do not understand those complexities, they are likely to go astray. That seems to be what happened in Wash v. Finch, a recent federal decision in the District of New Jersey. This…
Continue ReadingNew Scholarship on State Laws Limiting the Activities of Foreigners
States are important actors in U.S. foreign relations. TLB has, for example, covered New Jersey’s efforts to sanction Russia, Florida’s restrictions on alien ownership of property, and state court litigation on climate change, as well as state procedural law on forum non-conveniens and other topics. In the near term, litigation that challenges state regulation…
Continue ReadingSuccessor Jurisdiction and Anti-Terrorism Litigation
Transnational litigation often presents tricky questions of personal jurisdiction. Ongoing litigation in New York arising out of rocket attacks by Hizbollah does so in spades. This post reviews the recent New York Court of Appeals decision in Lelchook v. Société Générale de Banque au Liban SAL, answering a certified question posed by the Second Circuit…
Continue ReadingDon’t Forget About State Courts
Transnational litigation in the United States is often thought of as a matter for the federal courts. While it is true that many transnational cases end up in federal courts, state courts routinely hear transnational cases too. Scholars have started to catch on, with recent papers studying state courts’ approaches to the presumption against extraterritoriality,…
Continue Reading