X Has a New Forum Selection Clause
The company formerly known as Twitter (“X”) has announced that it will adopt new Terms of Service (“TOS”) effective November 15, 2024. Among other things, the new TOS includes a new forum selection clause. The clause in the old TOS required lawsuits against X to be brought in California. The clause in the new TOS…
Continue ReadingPuerto Rico, Law 75, and Forum Selection Clauses
Many years ago, Puerto Rico’s legislature approved the Dealer’s Contract Act—known as Law 75—to protect local distributors. Law 75 provides that a principal dealing with a distributor in Puerto Rico may terminate a distribution agreement only for “just cause.” In an attempt to evade this law, out-of-state principals frequently write choice-of-law clauses and forum selection…
Continue ReadingA Troubling Decision in the EDNY
In the annals of troubling decisions relating to the enforcement of foreign forum selection clauses, a recent opinion, Gurung v. MetaQuotes, Ltd., by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Judge Orelia E. Merchant) warrants special mention. It raises the question whether any forum selection clause will ever be deemed unreasonable…
Continue ReadingThe Small Potatoes Problem with New York Forum Selection Clauses
New York has long sought to attract cases to its courts—and to generate business for New York lawyers—by enforcing New York forum selection clauses when they appear in commercial contracts worth at least $1 million that are governed by New York law. This policy is codified in New York General Obligations Law 5-1402. What happens,…
Continue ReadingA Troubling Decision in the Fifth Circuit
The Fifth Circuit has issued a number of opinions over the years relating to the enforceability of forum selection clauses in transnational cases. Its recent decision in Matthews v. Tidewater, Inc. is among the most troubling. Background The plaintiff, Marek Matthews, worked as a seaman and captain from 1982 to 2016 on offshore supply vessels…
Continue ReadingRecent Developments Concerning the Hague Judgments Convention and COCA
Although the United States signed Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (COCA) in 2009, it has yet to ratify it. In this post, I report on some recent developments that offer a basis for (cautious) optimism that the United States may soon take the necessary steps to ratify both COCA and the Hague Judgments…
Continue ReadingMicrosoft’s Dispute Resolution Provisions Are (Still) a Mess
Exactly one year ago today, I authored a post titled “Microsoft’s Dispute Resolution Provisions Are a Mess.” In it, I argued that the “Jurisdiction and Governing Law” clause in the form purchase order used by Microsoft and its subsidiaries in 109 countries around the world was “incoherent.” My goal is writing the post was to…
Continue ReadingAdditional Thoughts on Firexo
I have three thoughts to add to John Coyle’s insightful post on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Firexo, Inc. v. Firexo Group Limited: one on choice of law, one on jurisdiction, and one on forum selection. Choice of Law Even though the majority declines to apply the “closely…
Continue ReadingThe Easy Way and the Hard Way
In the law, there are often two paths to a given destination. There is the easy way. And there is the hard way. In a recent New Jersey case involving a forum selection clause, the plaintiff was ultimately successful in defeating the defendant’s motion to dismiss. But man, oh man… did the plaintiff do it…
Continue ReadingThe Sixth Circuit Tackles Forum Selection Clauses
When U.S. judges fight about forum selection clauses, they tend to fight about one of two things. First, they fight about whether a federal court sitting in diversity should apply state or federal law to determine whether a clause is valid and enforceable. Second, they fight about whether a non-signatory may be bound by a…
Continue Reading