Skip to content

Subscribe for Weekly Updates

tlb-logo-h.svg
  • All Posts
  • Topics
    • Act of State Doctrine
    • Choice of Law
    • Choice-of-Law Clauses
    • Discovery
    • Extraterritoriality
    • Family Law
    • Foreign Judgments
    • Foreign Official Immunity
    • Foreign Sovereign Immunity
    • Foreign State Compulsion
    • Forum Non Conveniens
    • Forum Selection Clauses
    • Human Rights Litigation
    • International Comity
    • Judicial Assistance Treaties
    • Parallel Proceedings
    • Personal Jurisdiction
    • Sanctions & Terrorism
    • Service of Process
    • State Law
    • Supreme Court
    • Teaching Resources
    • Transnational Litigation
  • Contributors
  • Advisors
  • About
  • Contact
Menu
Close Menu
  • All Posts
  • Topics
    • Act of State Doctrine
    • Choice of Law
    • Choice-of-Law Clauses
    • Discovery
    • Extraterritoriality
    • Family Law
    • Foreign Judgments
    • Foreign Official Immunity
    • Foreign Sovereign Immunity
    • Foreign State Compulsion
    • Forum Non Conveniens
    • Forum Selection Clauses
    • Human Rights Litigation
    • International Comity
    • Judicial Assistance Treaties
    • Parallel Proceedings
    • Personal Jurisdiction
    • Sanctions & Terrorism
    • Service of Process
    • State Law
    • Supreme Court
    • Teaching Resources
    • Transnational Litigation
  • Contributors
  • Advisors
  • About
  • Contact

Supreme Court Denies Cert in Fighter Jets Case

William S. Dodge – George Washington University Law School william.dodge@law.gwu.edu @ProfBillDodge

June 17, 2024

 

Image by Andrzej from Pixabay

This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court denied review in Blenheim Capital Holdings Ltd. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., a case asking whether the purchase of fighter jets and other military equipment is a commercial activity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Despite a circuit split on the question, the Solicitor General recommended that the Supreme Court deny cert.

Topics: Foreign Sovereign Immunity, Supreme Court
Tags: Blenheim Capital Holdings Ltd. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, FSIA, South Korea, Supreme Court
Return Home

Posts navigation

Next Post

William S. Dodge

George Washington University Law School
william.dodge@law.gwu.edu @ProfBillDodge

Related Posts

Supreme Court Decides Fuld v. PLO

By Maggie Gardner

Three Questions for the Ninth Circuit in Antrix

By Paul B. Stephan

Supreme Court Remands CC/Devas v. Antrix

By Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Who Has the Authority to Waive Sovereign Immunity Via Contract?

By John F. Coyle

Recent Scholarship on Sovereign Immunity from Executive Measures

By Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Why Canada’s Terrorism Exception Does Not Violate International Law

By William S. Dodge
tlb-logo-v.svg

TLB is published with the support of the Branstetter Program at Vanderbilt Law School, Cornell Law School, George Washington University Law School, and the University of North Carolina School of Law.

  • All Posts
  • Topics
  • Contributors
  • Advisors
  • About
  • Contact
Twitter Linkedin RSS

Subscribe

Mailchimp Sign Up

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TLBlog.org is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Using the site or communicating with us through it does not form an attorney/client relationship and is not subject to rules governing attorney/client privilege or confidentiality.

© 2025 Transnational Litigation Blog. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.