Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Vanderbilt Law School

Ingrid Wuerth

Ingrid Brunk Wuerth (@WuerthIngrid) is the Helen Strong Curry Chair of International Law at Vanderbilt Law School where she is also serves as the Associate Dean for Research and the Director of the Branstetter Litigation and Dispute Resolution Program. She was a Co-Reporter for the American Law Institute’s Restatement (Fourth) of Foreign Relations Law and she has served as a member of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Law. In April, 2022 she will become co-Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of International Law. Professor Wuerth has written extensively on foreign relations law, transnational litigation, and public international law, including for the Harvard Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, and the American Journal of International Law. She is the co-author of U.S. Foreign Relations Law: Cases, Materials and Practice Exercises (5th ed. 2017).

Posts by Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk

Dismissal for Forum Non, With Two Alternative Fora?

The Fourth Circuit recently considered whether dismissal for forum non conveniens is appropriate if the case would have to be bifurcated and heard in two separate courts in the country that provides an alternative forum.  In AdvanFort Co. v. Zamil Offshore Services Co., the court answered “yes,” with one judge dissenting. This might have been…

Continue Reading

$29.8 Million Judgment in First-Ever Helms-Burton Jury Trial

A Cuban-American plaintiff has won a major jury verdict in the Southern District of Florida against four corporate defendants associated with Expedia Group. The case involves an island off the coast of Cuba, which the plaintiff, Mario Echevarría, claimed was expropriated from his family in 1959. The defendants provided digital platforms that allowed travelers to…

Continue Reading

Deciding the “Real Party in Interest” in FSIA Litigation

The Second Circuit has categorized a recent case against an individual Egyptian official as a case against the Egyptian government as the “real party in interest.”  The case, Hussein v. Maait, was then dismissed because Egypt was immune from suit.  The court of appeals did a nice job laying out and applying the relevant “real…

Continue Reading